People v. Chasar, 05PDJ046. October 12, 2005. Attorney Regulation. Following a hearing, the Presiding Disciplinary Judge approved a Conditional Admission of Misconduct submitted by the parties and suspended Respondent Kathleen Scott Chasar (Attorney Registration No. 29101) from the practice of law for a period of two years, effective November 11, 2005. On February 25, 2005, the New Jersey Supreme Court suspended Respondent from the practice of law for a period of three months after she made a material misrepresentation to a New Jersey court in her divorce proceedings. Her misconduct violated N.J. RPC 3.3(a)(1) (made a false statement of material fact or law to a tribunal); N.J. RPC 3.3(a)(4) (offered evidence she knew to be false); N.J. RPC 4.1(a) (made a false statement of material fact to a third person); and N.J. RPC 8.4(c) (engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation). Respondent also failed to comply with C.R.C.P. 251.21(b) by failing to report the New Jersey discipline in Colorado. The Parties agreed that the misconduct warranted a substantially different form of discipline in Colorado than the discipline imposed by the New Jersey Supreme Court and agreed to the two-year suspension.